Expert Report Analysis
Analyze expert reports for assumptions, methods, and weak points, each cited for counsel to probe.
What It Does
The agent summarizes each report, surfaces its assumptions and methods, and flags inconsistencies or unsupported steps with a citation to the page. A lawyer decides what to challenge.Without it: Working through dense expert reports to find the assumptions and gaps worth challenging takes days of specialist time.
- Traces each figure in the conclusion back to the table it came from
- Separates assumptions the expert states from the ones only the method implies
- Compares the report against the same expert's earlier reports held in the repository
- Where a method is contested in the case law, it links the authority
Illustrative example
Counsel has ten days to respond to a quantum report that puts loss at USD 4.2m on a 9% discount rate. The agent's summary notes the 9% appears only in the appendix workings and is never stated as an assumption, and points to page 31 where a different rate covers the same period. Counsel reads the two pages together and decides whether that goes to the expert in cross.
Expert reports
Served and prior
Case law database
Contested methods
Matter management
Matter, response window
Document management
Underlying source documents
Expert report analysis
SuggestStarts when
An expert report is served by the opposing side
How far it goes
it proposes, and a person approves before anything commits
Report summaries
Drafted
Assumptions and methods
Flagged
Page citations
Attached to each flag
More Legal Agents
Litigation document review
Review large litigation document sets for relevance, issues, and risk, with every call cited and logged.
Contract review and redlining
Check contracts against your playbook, flag risky terms, and propose redlines for a lawyer to approve.
Clause extraction and comparison
Pull key clauses across a contract set and compare them side by side, each linked to the source.
